Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!yale!husc6!caip!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!decwrl!arndt@lymph.dec.com
From: arndt@lymph.dec.com
Newsgroups: net.religion,talk.religion
Subject: Reply to Dan Tilque
Message-ID: <5177@decwrl.DEC.COM>
Date: Fri, 5-Sep-86 17:14:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.5177
Posted: Fri Sep  5 17:14:24 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 9-Sep-86 05:46:17 EDT
Sender: daemon@decwrl.DEC.COM
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 18
Xref: linus net.religion:10756 talk.religion:73

Hi Dan:

You say, "However, having a religious service ( and a prayer meeting IS
a religous service) on public property does violate the separation of
church and state."

Where o where did you find this out?????  I'd be very interested in seeing
some documentation from rulings by the courts about this because it is my
distinct understanding that the Supreme Court has ruled otherwise.  In 
particular that worship is a protected form of free speech and therefore
allowed 'equal access' to public property!!  Recall my 'Bashin' the Pagans'
posting.

Thanks much.

Keep chargin'

Ken Arndt