Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!g.cs.cmu.edu!kck From: kck@g.cs.cmu.edu (Karl Kluge) Newsgroups: talk.religion Subject: Re: Fundamentals Message-ID: <1037@g.cs.cmu.edu> Date: Mon, 8-Sep-86 17:02:27 EDT Article-I.D.: g.1037 Posted: Mon Sep 8 17:02:27 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 9-Sep-86 06:09:16 EDT References: <3373@ism780c.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI Lines: 41 Summary: What do "Fundamentalists" believe In article <3373@ism780c.UUCP>, marty@ism780c.UUCP (Marty Smith) writes: > > I realize that I don't know what fundamentalist christianity means. Would > someone list the beliefs that are necessary for a person to be a > fundamentalist Christian? > > Marty Smith As a non-Fundamentalist Christian, this is my perception of the set of beliefs: 1) The Bible in the original text is a) divinely inspired, and b) inerrent (ie, every last word is true, there was a flood with a person named Noah and his family the only humans to survive, etc) 2) The exclusive means of salvation is to believe in the vicarious sacrifice of Jesus Christ as atonement for our failures to love each other as we love ourselves (what is vulgarly called sin, a word I dislike because non-Christians especially tend to put a large emotional semantic overload on the word) in order to reconcile us with God. 3) A complete denial of the efficacy of works, almost to the point breaking belief #1 (I've known a number of Fundamentalists who really should go read the book of James). The really far out Fundamentalists (like Jack T. Chick) go so far as to assert that the King James Bible is also inerrent, and is a faithful and accurate translation of the original texts. Chick seems to think all the advances in our knowledge of Hebrew and Greek as they were used when the Bible was being written are a plot by the Catholic Church to corrupt Christian doctrine. Flames from Jack Chick followers to /dev/null. Chip Kluge (kck@g.cs.cmu.edu (ARPA)) Given that an institution cannot have an opinion, I find all the disclaimers we put in our posts really stupid.