Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!husc6!seismo!vrdxhq!BMS-AT!stuart
From: stuart@BMS-AT.UUCP (Stuart D. Gathman)
Newsgroups: talk.religion,talk.origins
Subject: Who can know?
Message-ID: <198@BMS-AT.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 9-Sep-86 21:53:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: BMS-AT.198
Posted: Tue Sep  9 21:53:49 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Sep-86 04:26:24 EDT
References: <15222@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <988@hoptoad.uucp> <8443@duke.duke.UUCP> <1036@g.cs.cmu.edu>
Organization: Business Management Systems, Inc., Fairfax, VA
Lines: 11
Xref: linus talk.religion:94 talk.origins:17
Summary: I still insist

In article <1036@g.cs.cmu.edu>, kck@g.cs.cmu.edu (Karl Kluge) writes:

> "randomness". There are simply fundamental limitations on the knowledge
> one can have of the state of a quantum mechanical system.
  ^^^

The knowledge *we* can have is certainly limited.  Unless you assume
that only beings with our physical limitations are observing, this
does not mean there are no observers.
-- 
Stuart D. Gathman	<..!seismo!{vrdxhq|dgis}!BMS-AT!stuart>