Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!yale!husc6!think!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh From: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) Newsgroups: talk.religion.misc,net.religion.christian Subject: Re: Christian Roots of the U.S. Message-ID: <1138@cybvax0.UUCP> Date: Tue, 9-Sep-86 13:38:46 EDT Article-I.D.: cybvax0.1138 Posted: Tue Sep 9 13:38:46 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 11-Sep-86 04:17:36 EDT References: <1583@vax135.UUCP> Reply-To: mrh@cybvax0.UUCP (Mike Huybensz) Organization: Cybermation, Inc., Cambridge, MA Lines: 32 Xref: linus talk.religion.misc:19 net.religion.christian:4601 In article <1583@vax135.UUCP> gks@vax135.UUCP (Ken Swanson) writes: > The following is based on excerpts from a sermon, "Church and State," by > Rev. Dr. D. James Kennedy... > > Question: Did the founders of this nation intend it to be a secularist, > neutral, humanist nation; or did they believe that this was > a nation created to the glory of God and that it was to be a > godly, Christian state? Depends who you considered the founders of the nation. The so-called evidence considers only early settlers who moved here, but did not found our nation. And should you consider the leaders, or the masses as founders? If you consider the signers of the Declaration of Independance and the ratifiers of the Constitution to be the founders, then you can clearly state that the founders were NOT united in what they intended our nation to be in many ways: religious, social, economic, etc. On the other hand, it's a moot question. There's no reason why we should be entirely agreed with the founders of our nation: indeed they might have changed their minds on a variety of issues if they had survived into our own times. Such as slavery, interference in foreign affairs, religion (their Christian denominations are mostly tiny minorities now), taxation, etc. Government is a dynamic system that changes with the times. We cannot entirely rely on a static idea of what was intended in the past for conditions that have since changed. The whole idea of what the founding fathers thought is stupid without comparisons of the contexts then and now. -- Mike Huybensz ...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!cybvax0!mrh