Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!SLACVM.BITNET!REL
From: REL@SLACVM.BITNET.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.computers.vax
Subject: Is VMS 4.4 BACKUP worse?
Message-ID: <8609100429.AA05468@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Fri, 22-Aug-86 19:37:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8609100429.AA05468
Posted: Fri Aug 22 19:37:00 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 10-Sep-86 21:56:31 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 12
Approved: info-vax@sri-kl.arpa

Date: 22 August 1986, 15:36:23 PST
From: <REL@SLACVM>
To:   <INFO-VAX@SRI-KL.ARPA>
Subject: Is VMS 4.4 BACKUP worse?

Has anyone else noticed an alarming increase in the number
of BACKUP *recoverable* errors when writing to tape in
version 4.4?  It also seems to me that the number of these
*recoverable* errors that are really recoverable has dropped
from 90% to about 10%.  We have a 780 and recently went
from 4.2 to 4.4.
                    Bob Leedy (REL@SLACVM) bitnet