Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!mordor!sri-spam!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!KESTREL.ARPA!king
From: king@KESTREL.ARPA
Newsgroups: mod.politics
Subject: Poli-Sci Digest   V6 #65
Message-ID: <12236094147.58.MCGREW@RED.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Wed, 3-Sep-86 19:52:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: RED.12236094147.58.MCGREW
Posted: Wed Sep  3 19:52:38 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 4-Sep-86 03:48:27 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: king@kestrel.ARPA
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 28
Approved: poli-sci@red.rutgers.edu


   Date: Fri, 22 Aug 86 23:00:16 pdt
   From: king@kestrel.ARPA (Dick King)


   a> nobody should be forced to cook for others against their will

   b> A lunch counter should sell to any customer with money

   c> Selling lunches is okay

   I don't necessarily agree with 2>, but it does not strike me as
   inconsistent to codify a principle that if you are in a certain
   business you should serve all customers.  It is not nonsensical to
   say that a prostitute can't refuse customers.

   -dick

I don't often reply to my own mail :-), but I hope I didn't throw an
impression that I advocate that a prostitute loses the right to have
her rapists arrested.  Prositiutes have that right, as lunch counter
operators have the right not to be forced to cook on their own time.
I only claim that there is no immediate inconsistency in a principle
that owners of a public business must serve all comers AT THAT PLACE
OF BUSINESS.

-dick
-------