Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!cbosgd!ucbvax!JPL-VLSI.ARPA!tencati From: tencati@JPL-VLSI.ARPA Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: re: ARPAnet "Congestion" Message-ID: <860929091101.00f@Jpl-VLSI.ARPA> Date: Mon, 29-Sep-86 12:11:01 EDT Article-I.D.: Jpl-VLSI.860929091101.00f Posted: Mon Sep 29 12:11:01 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 30-Sep-86 21:01:26 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 31 Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa I have a purely academic question. Is anyone considering the fact that there are many users on the ARPAnet that are not "official" users? When I was in college a few years ago, an arpanet account was very hard to get. Unless you were faculty, forget it (this was at USC). It seems that now there are many more students and people who are not really using the net for work, as much as an electronic post office. My host spends 90% of it's time on the ARPAnet sending and receiving INFO-THIS, and INFO-THAT. Also, I have multiple users receiving the same message from INFO-WHATEVER as separate TCP connections to my host. I think part of the congestion mess is that hosts (like mine) do not utilize "central mailboxes" and do the redistribution locally. I do feel that the subscribership of the net, and the "official DARPA business" rules that applied a few years ago have been very lax lately. Now, most universities let their students onto the net, and most hosts with network access do the same. I'm not saying that this should be restricted because the ARPAnet is a useful tool. Especially to system managers like myself. I just think that with the increased volume of users and the proliferation of INFO lists, the mail traffic has increased drastically over the past few years, and with the advent of these new protocols (PC/IP for example), it is becoming easier and easier for *anyone* to get connected up to the ARPAnet... I'm not flaming, I just had an extra 2 cents in my pocket... Ron Tencati JPL-VLSI.ARPA