Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!sri-spam!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!sdcsvax!noscvax!trout!rupp
From: rupp@trout.UUCP (William L. Rupp)
Newsgroups: net.ham-radio,net.video,net.crypt,net.mail,net.legal
Subject: Re: Some comments on the Electronic Communications Privacy Act
Message-ID: <315@trout.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 19-Sep-86 11:00:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: trout.315
Posted: Fri Sep 19 11:00:49 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Sep-86 20:43:13 EDT
References: <1031@frog.UUCP> <15591@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <1240@mhuxo.UUCP> <1035@frog.UUCP>
Reply-To: rupp@trout.UUCP (William L. Rupp)
Organization: Computer Sciences Corp, San Diego
Lines: 3
Keywords: DES RSA LPC cheap simple too late
Xref: mnetor net.ham-radio:2265 net.video:2223 net.crypt:590 net.mail:1203 net.legal:3616

I think I have missed something in this discussion of communications privacy.  
Has there been a proposal in Congress to ban transmission encryption, or is
that eventuality merely a supposition on the part of some net.crypt posters?