Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!princeton!allegra!ulysses!sfmag!sfsup!mhuxm!mhuxf!mhuxi!mhuhk!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!bobmon
From: bobmon@iuvax.UUCP (Robert Montante)
Newsgroups: net.emacs
Subject: Re: MS-DOS emacs??
Message-ID: <1645@iuvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 14-Oct-86 23:34:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: iuvax.1645
Posted: Tue Oct 14 23:34:27 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 15-Oct-86 21:50:20 EDT
References: <1137@mhuxt.UUCP> <158@darth.UUCP>
Reply-To: bobmon@iuvax.UUCP (Robert Montante)
Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington
Lines: 18
Summary: Try micro-EMACS -- also a query to Dan Lawrence or whomever

I find microEMACS (v3.7) to be a nice version, although I'm not extremely
familiar with others.  A professor of mine says he prefers Epsilon (slightly)
because he can define custom commands more easily.  On the other hand, the price
for microEMACS is just about unbeatable.  There was a source-and-executable
posting on net.micro.pc awhile ago, and its author posted a BBS phone number
for it here (I saw it as "Re: Orphaned") recently.
	BTW -- I've seen the claim that it should be compilable under "small-
code-large-memory" model, but when I tried with Lattice 2.15, I got a ~78K file
so I had to go to "large-code-large-memory" (I'm trying for maximum IBM PC
compatibility).  Am I doing something wrong, or is that just the way it goes?

*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*-=-*
 Datclaimer: "[Usual disclaimer: I have no opinion, therefore I don't exist .]"
Disclaimer: I opine, therefore I am.  My employer, however, is a figment.

RAMontante
Computer Science				"Have you hugged ME today?"
Indiana University