Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!topaz!ll-xn!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!hplabs!tektronix!tekig!tekig5!waynekn From: waynekn@tekig5.UUCP (Wayne Knapp) Newsgroups: net.lang.c++ Subject: C++ or something else? Message-ID: <1165@tekig5.UUCP> Date: Tue, 23-Sep-86 18:32:24 EDT Article-I.D.: tekig5.1165 Posted: Tue Sep 23 18:32:24 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 29-Sep-86 05:39:08 EDT Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR Lines: 16 Can anyone tell me why one would C++ instead of using Objective-C by PPI. Is C++ better, or is C++ a subset of Objective-C. Or do so many people use C++ because it is cheap and easy to get. We are interested in working with a object oriented C. Our code runs in embedded processor systems. Cost is no object to us. What do people think is the best choice. I'll be happly to post a summery. Thank you very much for any help, Wayne Knapp ...!tektronix!tekig5!waynekn