Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!brl-adm!brl-smoke!smoke!LINNDR%VUENGVAX.BITNET@wiscvm.ARPA
From: LINNDR%VUENGVAX.BITNET@wiscvm.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Order of function argument evaluation
Message-ID: <3965@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 22-Sep-86 01:28:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.3965
Posted: Mon Sep 22 01:28:49 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 24-Sep-86 07:05:40 EDT
Sender: news@brl-smoke.ARPA
Lines: 21

>Does anyone know of a compiler for which the program below does NOT
>produce the output shown?
>       .
>       .       <program deleted>
>       .
>----- PROGRAM OUTPUT ---------------
>2,1,0
>3
>------------------------------------
It seems I can answer my own question; the Sargasso C compiler for the
DEC-10 under TOPS-10 produces
-----
0,1,2
     3
------

This sort of behavior is up to the compiler writer, isn't it?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
David Linn
LINNDR%VUENGVAX.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU          ! Internet (I think)
...!psuvax1!vuengvax.bitnet!linndr              ! Usenet