Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ll-xn!mit-amt!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ittatc!bunker!garys
From: garys@bunker.UUCP (Gary M. Samuelson)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: "If it has a bug, it isn't 'C'"
Message-ID: <1215@bunker.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 1-Oct-86 13:58:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: bunker.1215
Posted: Wed Oct  1 13:58:01 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Oct-86 01:38:29 EDT
Reply-To: garys@bunker.UUCP (Gary M. Samuelson)
Organization: Bunker Ramo, Trumbull Ct
Lines: 17

In article X, someone (doesn't matter who -- I think several
people have done the same thing) writes:

>Then it isn't a C compiler...

This is rapidly becoming one of my pet peeves.  It seems that it is
with increasing frequency that I see comments to the effect that if
a C compiler has a bug, then it isn't a C compiler.  This is pedantic;
by that reasoning, there isn't a C compiler in the world, and probably
never will be.  Why not just say, "Your compiler has a bug," instead
of, "Your compiler isn't a C compiler."

My compiler has a "feature."
Yours has a "bug."
His isn't even C.

Gary Samuelson