Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!gatech!cuae2!ltuxa!ttrdc!levy
From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP (Daniel R. Levy)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: "If it has a bug, it isn't 'C'"
Message-ID: <1211@ttrdc.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 5-Oct-86 20:03:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: ttrdc.1211
Posted: Sun Oct  5 20:03:49 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 8-Oct-86 00:20:38 EDT
References: <1215@bunker.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T, Computer Systems Division, Skokie, IL
Lines: 28

In article <1215@bunker.UUCP>, garys@bunker.UUCP (Gary M. Samuelson) writes:
>In article X, someone (doesn't matter who -- I think several
>people have done the same thing) writes:
>>Then it isn't a C compiler...
>This is rapidly becoming one of my pet peeves.  It seems that it is
>with increasing frequency that I see comments to the effect that if
>a C compiler has a bug, then it isn't a C compiler.  This is pedantic;
>by that reasoning, there isn't a C compiler in the world, and probably
>never will be.  Why not just say, "Your compiler has a bug," instead
>of, "Your compiler isn't a C compiler."
>My compiler has a "feature."
>Yours has a "bug."
>His isn't even C.
>Gary Samuelson

That peeves me, too, as being an overly sarcastic comment, even if spoken by
a Guru.  Guy Harris has made this comment several times if memory
serves me right.  I have not noticed any others making the comment that
"it isn't a C compiler."  Don't expect Guy to reply to this message (I
think I'm in his kill file).
-- 
 -------------------------------    Disclaimer:  The views contained herein are
|       dan levy | yvel nad      |  my own and are not at all those of my em-
|         an engihacker @        |  ployer or the administrator of any computer
| at&t computer systems division |  upon which I may hack.
|        skokie, illinois        |
 --------------------------------   Path: ..!{akgua,homxb,ihnp4,ltuxa,mvuxa,
	   go for it!  			allegra,ulysses,vax135}!ttrdc!levy