Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!caip!brl-adm!brl-smoke!smoke!rbbb@rice.edu
From: rbbb@rice.edu (David Chase)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Expression sequencing/\"standards\"
Message-ID: <4527@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 10-Oct-86 19:01:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.4527
Posted: Fri Oct 10 19:01:45 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Oct-86 21:11:25 EDT
Sender: news@brl-smoke.ARPA
Lines: 8

> I find that the Three Holy Documents of C (K&R, H&S, the draft ANSI
> standard) are a little muddy on this point, though I agree with Fabbian.

If the "standard language definition" is ambiguous, then it isn't a
definition.  Have them clean up the definition.  In this case, having an
answer is much more important than which answer you have.

David