Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdragon.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!watdragon!jmsellens From: jmsellens@watdragon.UUCP (John M Sellens) Newsgroups: can.politics,net.micro Subject: Re: To sell software to Capetown U. or not to sell? Message-ID: <1523@watdragon.UUCP> Date: Tue, 30-Sep-86 18:27:12 EDT Article-I.D.: watdrago.1523 Posted: Tue Sep 30 18:27:12 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 1-Oct-86 03:49:36 EDT References: <674@looking.UUCP> Reply-To: jmsellens@watdragon.UUCP (John M Sellens) Distribution: can Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 29 Xref: watmath can.politics:1031 net.micro:15681 Summary: I'm surprised that Brad's article hasn't yet provoked a huge flurry of response. So I'll wade into the (whatever - I lost my train of analogy): In article <674@looking.UUCP> brad@looking.UUCP (Brad Templeton) writes: >1) How can one verify that this is the truth? The Canadian gov't has agencies that help people export stuff (Export Development agency?) - perhaps they could provide some info. Or External Affairs? There's probably some organization in Toronto working at fighting apartheid - is there an ANC branch? >2) If it is, should a refusal to sell to South Africans be general, or >should you make exceptions where you can? I, personally, have trouble with this boycott idea. I have heard blacks from South Africa speak both for and against boycotts, both cultural and financial. Heck, I even watched the New Music show on South Africa and songs like "Sun City". To me it really doesn't seem clear whether a boycott helps or hurts the blacks (and other groups, such as the Indians) in South Africa. If I were you, I think I would try to obtain some independent confirmation of the Professor's assertions. Then, if it is non-discriminatory, and working towards that, then I think I would sell it. I might make a point of letting the South African gov't (Dear Mr. Botha:) know that you were selling to this University only because they oppose racism. John