Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!think!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!jade!iris!srm
From: srm@iris.berkeley.edu (Richard Mateosian)
Newsgroups: net.micro.68k
Subject: Re: Re: BYTE "68000" issue
Message-ID: <1360@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Tue, 30-Sep-86 03:08:32 EDT
Article-I.D.: jade.1360
Posted: Tue Sep 30 03:08:32 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 1-Oct-86 02:44:06 EDT
References: <1058@hoptoad.UUCP> <12700001@hpcvla.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: srm@iris.berkeley.edu.UUCP (Richard Mateosian)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 14

>>I thought BYTE was refereed and edited better than this, but it isn't. 

>  I am not familiar with BYTE's general policies, however this article
>  was not refereed, it was solicited.  The article outline and contents
>  were agreed to with the input of BYTE technical editors.   We wrote
>  the article after being requested to do so by BYTE.
>

I had a similar experience.  I wrote an article for the Jan 1984 BYTE
("1984 Is the Year of the 32-Bit Microprocessor").  It was solicited,
and they printed what I sent them almost verbatim.

Richard Mateosian    ...ucbvax!ucbiris!srm 	     2919 Forest Avenue     
415/540-7745         srm%ucbiris@Berkeley.EDU        Berkeley, CA  94705