Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!cornell!batcomputer!braner From: braner@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU (braner) Newsgroups: net.micro.68k,net.micro.amiga,net.micro.atari16,net.micro.mac Subject: Re: The Motorola 68030 Message-ID: <1134@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU> Date: Tue, 30-Sep-86 18:52:41 EDT Article-I.D.: batcompu.1134 Posted: Tue Sep 30 18:52:41 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 4-Oct-86 01:36:34 EDT References: <2270@gitpyr.UUCP> <7637@sun.uucp> <729@sauron.UUCP> <200@mipos3.UUCP> Reply-To: braner@batcomputer.UUCP (braner) Organization: Theory Center, Cornell University, Ithaca NY Lines: 20 Keywords: here we go again... Xref: mnetor net.micro.68k:1305 net.micro.amiga:4988 net.micro.atari16:2269 net.micro.mac:7356 [] Gee, that was to much to ignore... Can anybody point me to the numerous powerful multi-user super-boxes that are using the '286 or '386 (AT doesn't count since it is actually used by single users, and in 8088 emulation mode, primarily)? As far as I can tell, designers that are not REQUIRED by their employers to use Intel chips have long used the 68K family for that purpose! If you want REALLY high-end computing power, you get a CRAY and such. If you want a real big bang per buck, you get a 68K personal machine. Unless, of course, you only feel comfortable in the crowd, the crowd that will use 8080 software forever (they think). - Moshe Braner BTW: the ST + 32081 math coprocessor beats (for number crunching) the portion of the power of the VAX I work on that actually labors for me. Price? still < $1000