Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!hoptoad!gnu
From: gnu@hoptoad.uucp (John Gilmore)
Newsgroups: net.micro.68k
Subject: Re: The Motorola 68030
Message-ID: <1172@hoptoad.uucp>
Date: Thu, 2-Oct-86 16:40:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: hoptoad.1172
Posted: Thu Oct  2 16:40:24 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Oct-86 06:39:34 EDT
References: <2270@gitpyr.UUCP> <7637@sun.uucp> <729@sauron.UUCP> <200@mipos3.UUCP>
Organization: Nebula Consultants in San Francisco
Lines: 16

In article <200@mipos3.UUCP>, Ken Shoemaker writes:
>                                        Should I feel vindicated that Mot
> has finally decided that on-chip memory management is a good idea? 

Yes.

>                                                                     And
> what about performance?  Why would a new, ultra-high end user choose
> the 68030 over, say, the Clipper, or the MIPS chips...

Good question.  Why would they choose the 80386 over these chips?
It's probably a very similar set of reasons.
(you get extra bonus credit if you just THINK about this and don't POST!)
-- 
John Gilmore  {sun,ptsfa,lll-crg,ihnp4}!hoptoad!gnu   jgilmore@lll-crg.arpa
		     May the Source be with you!