Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!qantel!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!hamilton
From: hamilton@uiucuxc.CSO.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: The Motorola 68030
Message-ID: <148600150@uiucuxc>
Date: Tue, 30-Sep-86 15:45:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucuxc.148600150
Posted: Tue Sep 30 15:45:00 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 3-Oct-86 11:59:14 EDT
References: <2270@gitpyr.UUCP>
Lines: 18
Nf-ID: #R:gitpyr.UUCP:2270:uiucuxc:148600150:000:791
Nf-From: uiucuxc.CSO.UIUC.EDU!hamilton    Sep 30 14:45:00 1986


hadeishi@husc4.harvard.edu sez:
>Now that Motorola
>has released this chip, they have in *every category of chip* a far
>superior chip than does Intel.  68030 > 80386, 68020 > 80286, 68010 and
>68000 >> 80186, 8086, 68008 > 8088.  The 68000 series chips are in every case
>more orthogonally designed, faster, more compatible with each other,
>and easier to program.

i agree with your sentiment, but i think you have the chips mismatched.
it should be more like: 68030 > ???, 68020 > 80386, 680[01]0 > 80286.

	wayne hamilton
	U of Il and US Army Corps of Engineers CERL
UUCP:	{ihnp4,pur-ee,convex}!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!hamilton
ARPA:	hamilton%uiucuxc@a.cs.uiuc.edu	USMail:	Box 476, Urbana, IL 61801
CSNET:	hamilton%uiucuxc@uiuc.csnet	Phone:	(217)333-8703
CIS:    [73047,544]			PLink: w hamilton