Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!CORY.BERKELEY.EDU!dillon
From: dillon@CORY.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: Re: LATTICE BUG (3.03)	-unsigned? short optimization bug
Message-ID: <8610111659.AA11477@cory.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Sat, 11-Oct-86 12:59:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: cory.8610111659.AA11477
Posted: Sat Oct 11 12:59:55 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Oct-86 21:48:37 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 17

>Actually, I wonder about this.  Shouldn't the expected result be zero?
>
>The partial sum (y+z) should be done completely in ushort, giving
>      0xFFFF + 0x0002  = 0x0001 (retaining only the lower 16 bits)
>
>so that the quotient (1/16) [done in integer math] should be zero.
>I don't see any reason why the code generated for "x=..." and "xx=..."
>should differ.
>
>Am I missing something here?

	All integral arguments, baring floating expressions, for arithmatic 
operations are supposed to be extended to INT if they are <= INT.  On Lattice,
this is 32bits.

						-Matt