Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!husc6!think!nike!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!ucla-cs!rutgers!lll-crg!lll-lcc!qantel!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!hamilton
From: hamilton@uiucuxc.CSO.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Re: More thoughts on terminal programs
Message-ID: <2091@curly.ucla-cs.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 13-Oct-86 21:13:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: curly.2091
Posted: Mon Oct 13 21:13:59 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 16-Oct-86 02:13:05 EDT
References: <2631@garfield.UUCP>
Organization: UCLA CS Department
Lines: 22
Nf-ID: #R:garfield.UUCP:2631:uiucuxc:148600160:000:1088
Nf-From: uiucuxc.CSO.UIUC.EDU!hamilton    Oct 12 16:14:00 1986


john russell says:
>Unique point: It doesn't claim a higher rate than it can go at. I have seen
>menu selections for 57K baud on terminal emulators that updated the screen
>at about 1200 baud. Of course, the line would hold, but massive flow
>control was needed. DBW's vt100 claims only up to 9600 baud, at which it
>performs quite well, thank you.

    actually, i'm going to add 19.2K and 38.4K to vt100 and see how well
they work.  i can't talk to my vax at those speeds (my leased line only
has 9600 baud modems), but i have this AT sitting next to my amiga...
amiga-kermit(4d(060)) talks to ms-kermit(2.29jrd) at 38.4K without
dropping packets, tho the thruput is only ~680 bytes/sec.  this is still
better than running at 9600, where thruput is down to ~450 bytes/sec.
it's time for sliding windows!

	wayne hamilton
	U of Il and US Army Corps of Engineers CERL
UUCP:	{ihnp4,pur-ee,convex}!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!hamilton
ARPA:	hamilton%uiucuxc@a.cs.uiuc.edu	USMail:	Box 476, Urbana, IL 61801
CSNET:	hamilton%uiucuxc@uiuc.csnet	Phone:	(217)333-8703
CIS:    [73047,544]			PLink: w hamilton