Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!caip!think!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!mcnc!ecsvax!ranger From: ranger@ecsvax.UUCP (Rick N. Fincher) Newsgroups: net.micro.apple Subject: Re: Re: InCider's comments on the new //GS Message-ID: <2116@ecsvax.UUCP> Date: Thu, 9-Oct-86 12:46:50 EDT Article-I.D.: ecsvax.2116 Posted: Thu Oct 9 12:46:50 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 11-Oct-86 19:33:18 EDT References: <2092@ecsvax.UUCP> <844@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> Organization: UNC Educational Computing Service Lines: 28 > The '816 isn't that fast, and its hardly RISC. One of the basic RISC > philosophies is to have a single set of instructions that read and write > memory, while everything else is a register-to-register instruction. > This lets things happen inside, very quickly. This also requires a large > number of registers (the Berkely RISC has near 200, as I recall). The > '816 still has just on general purpose register, and lets nearly every > instruction access memory. And it has to access memory 8 bits at a time, > while the 68000 can touch 16 at a time. The '816 is also missing more > sophisticated instructions, like multiplies. Its certainly an advance > over the 6502, but it compares much more closely to the 8088. CLOSE to RISC. The RISC-like features are: hardwired for speed, lots of piplining and many 1 cycle operations. Although the 68000 can work on 16 bits at a time it takes 4 cycles to do it. The '816 can load or store 16 bits in 2 cycles. Not to put down the 68000 however because it is a clearly superior chip. Comparisons to the 8088 are more apt (and more fun!), the 65816 is a clear winner here, but there is all of that 8088 software out there..... > > > Rick Fincher > > > > Ranger@ecsvax > -- > ============================================================================ > Dave Haynie {caip,ihnp4,allegra,seismo}!cbmvax!daveh > > These opinions are my own, though if you try them out, and decide > that you really like them, a small donation would be appreciated.