Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!chinet!nucsrl!naim
From: naim@nucsrl.UUCP (Naim Abdullah)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: System V and SIGCLD
Message-ID: <2410003@nucsrl.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 1-Oct-86 18:48:23 EDT
Article-I.D.: nucsrl.2410003
Posted: Wed Oct  1 18:48:23 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Oct-86 06:06:55 EDT
References: <2389@hcrvx2.UUCP>
Organization: Northwestern University
Lines: 18

Bob Lenk writes:
>Also, the
>precise semantics of how SIGCLD is "queued" do not agree between System
>V documentation and implementation, so there could be disagreement on
>what to standardize.

Could you explain this a little bit further ? In what way, does the
implementation differ from the documentation ?

I have a stake in SIGCLD because one fairly large program that I have
written depends upon SIGCLD (although I was aware of the warning I
didn't see how I could duplicate the asynchronous notification by 
any other (reasonable) means; any ideas out there ?)

        Naim Abdullah,
	Dept. of EECS,
	Northwestern University,
	ihnp4!nucsrl!naim