Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: Re: Location of partition table on disk Message-ID: <7195@utzoo.UUCP> Date: Mon, 6-Oct-86 16:06:05 EDT Article-I.D.: utzoo.7195 Posted: Mon Oct 6 16:06:05 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 6-Oct-86 16:06:05 EDT References: <7473@sun.uucp> <15583@mordor.ARPA>, <1173@hoptoad.uucp> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Lines: 9 I too thought it would be a good idea to have the partition table on the disk it partitioned, until I read a paper on the Cray-2 Unix port. They had the right idea: the size and disk location of each partition is recorded in the /dev inode for it. The kernel stashes the details in internal tables when such an inode is opened or mounted. It seems to me that this is a cleaner solution all around. -- Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology {allegra,ihnp4,decvax,pyramid}!utzoo!henry