Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ritcv!spw2562
From: spw2562@ritcv.UUCP
Newsgroups: soc.college
Subject: Re: Student opinion on instructors.(Example from Dartmouth)
Message-ID: <17@ritcv.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 24-Sep-86 12:35:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: ritcv.17
Posted: Wed Sep 24 12:35:43 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Sep-86 23:29:58 EDT
References: <2246@gitpyr.UUCP> <5160@dartvax.UUCP> <1084@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU>
Reply-To: spw2562@ritcv.UUCP (Steve Wall)
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY
Lines: 16
Keywords: comments, evaluations, opinion


	Here at RIT, each dept gives its own evaluations, sometime late
	in the quarter (can't remember exactly when).  The thing I've noticed
	is that some depts don't use evaluations.  It also seems that
	the worse instuctors are the ones that don't get evaluated,
	which really bothers me, because that generally means noone
	in administration will get a really good idea of how poor
	that particular instructor is.

	No, I won't give out any names. 8-]

==============================================================================
        Steve Wall  @  Rochester Institute of Technology
        UUCP: ..{allegra|seismo}!rochester!ritcv!spw2562   Unix 4.3 BSD
        BITNET: SPW2562@RITVAXC                            VAX/VMS 4.4
	Disclaimer: I said THAT?!?  Naw, couldn't have been me...