Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!rutgers!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!usc-oberon!bacall!baparao
From: baparao@bacall.UUCP (Bapa Rao)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian
Subject: Re: Seperate Sikh State
Message-ID: <2165@bacall.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 10-Oct-86 12:51:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: bacall.2165
Posted: Fri Oct 10 12:51:01 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 12-Oct-86 05:52:46 EDT
References: <2536@ihlpg.UUCP> <1245@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU> <2164@bacall.UUCP>
Reply-To: baparao@bacall.UUCP (Bapa Rao)
Distribution: net
Organization: CS&CE Depts, U.S.C., Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 15
Summary: Correction to my previous posting

In article <2164@bacall.UUCP> baparao@bacall.UUCP (Bapa Rao) writes:

>The point is that the precise notion of a Bhartriharian Moorkha has been 
>pervasive throughout India ever since. Let a random Indian, (be he Hindu, |
>Muslim, Sikh, Christian, Jain, Buddhist, Animist, Brahmin, or Dalit, man or
>woman) be confronted with Martillo, and he will nod his head and marvel that 
>Martillo must indeed be old, since he had, so obviously, been known to the 
>wise Bhartrihari himself. 

Sorry, I should have said "(be he Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, Christian, Jain, 
Buddhist, Animist, Jew, Brahmin, or Dalit, man or woman)" instead of 
leaving out "Jew" as I did. Of course a random Jewish Indian is as adept
as any other Indian at knowing Martillo to be a Moorkha. 

						--Bapa Rao.