Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!decwrl!nonode.dec.com!cherson
From: cherson@nonode.dec.com (David Cherson, WOO/D89 - 236-2229)
Newsgroups: soc.misc
Subject: Down with engineerlish!
Message-ID: <5528@decwrl.DEC.COM>
Date: Thu, 25-Sep-86 08:35:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.5528
Posted: Thu Sep 25 08:35:41 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 29-Sep-86 01:36:49 EDT
Sender: daemon@decwrl.DEC.COM
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 19


 
>I was under the impression that "functionality" was a legal English word, until
>I was challenged to find it in a dictionary. I could not.  (Is there anyone who
>has a dictionary which *does* define it?)  What could I use instead  (features?
>functionalism???) in phrases like  "a description of a system's functionality",
>"this product has more functionality"?

You're right, there is no such word in the English language as "functionality".
But what's wrong with using the correct term - function?  This industry has
taken the English language and twisted it for it's own purposes.  If you think
that functionality is weird, then listen to a new one I heard the other day,
"productization".  Apparently this is being used to describe the process of
a product going the developing stages to market.

I don't know, I expect people who possess a college degree(even in 
engineering:-) to understand English.

David Cherson