Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!rutgers!seismo!mcvax!ukc!reading!minster!fisher
From: fisher@minster.UUCP
Newsgroups: soc.misc
Subject: Re: the (non)word "functionality"
Message-ID: <528805870.7245@minster.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 4-Oct-86 06:31:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: minster.528805870.7245
Posted: Sat Oct  4 06:31:10 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 9-Oct-86 04:09:20 EDT
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of York, England
Lines: 17

Subject: Re: the (non)word "functionality"

> What could I use instead  (features?
> functionalism???) in phrases like  "a description of a system's 
> functionality", "this product has more functionality"?

For "a description of the system's functionality" read "what the system does"

For "this product has more functionality" read "this product works better"

----
Tony Fisher
Dept. of Computer Science, The University of York, York YO1 5DD, U.K.
Tel. +44 904 430000 ext. 5669 or 492
Janet:  fisher@uk.ac.york.minster
DARPA:  fisher%uk.ac.york.minster@ucl-cs
UUCP:   fisher@minster.UUCP