Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!elbereth!rutgers!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!pyramid!ucat!scc!steiny
From: steiny@scc.UUCP (Don Steiny)
Newsgroups: soc.misc
Subject: Re: the (non)word "functionality"
Message-ID: <757@scc.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 8-Oct-86 12:37:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: scc.757
Posted: Wed Oct  8 12:37:40 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Oct-86 05:13:39 EDT
References: <528805870.7245@minster.UUCP>
Organization: Don Steiny Software
Lines: 17

In article <528805870.7245@minster.UUCP>, fisher@minster.UUCP writes:
> Subject: Re: the (non)word "functionality"
> 
> > What could I use instead  (features?
> > functionalism???) in phrases like  "a description of a system's 
> > functionality", "this product has more functionality"?
> 
> For "this product has more functionality" read "this product works better"
> 
	How does it work better?   Did you fix bugs or increase 
functionality?
-- 
scc!steiny
Don Steiny @ Don Steiny Software 
109 Torrey Pine Terrace
Santa Cruz, Calif. 95060
(408) 425-0382