Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!caip!sri-spam!nike!think!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!watmath!atbowler
From: atbowler@watmath.UUCP (Alan T. Bowler [SDG])
Newsgroups: soc.motss,net.med,net.legal
Subject: Tomato fruit or vegetable
Message-ID: <3276@watmath.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 20-Sep-86 07:16:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: watmath.3276
Posted: Sat Sep 20 07:16:24 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 22-Sep-86 07:46:16 EDT
References: <613@curly.ucla-cs.ARPA> <544@hadron.UUCP> <448@aecom.UUCP> <2258@hammer.UUCP> <1817@mb2c.UUCP>
Reply-To: atbowler@watmath.UUCP (Alan T. Bowler [SDG])
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 14
Xref: mnetor soc.motss:4 net.med:3412 net.legal:3638

In article <1817@mb2c.UUCP> mpr@mb2c.UUCP (Mark Reina) writes:
>In article <2258@hammer.UUCP>, seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy) writes:
>> In article <448@aecom.UUCP> werner@aecom.UUCP (Craig Werner) writes:
>> 
>> >	Of course, the tomato was legislated to be a vegetable.
>> 
>> So? It *is* a vegetable.
>
>	The tomato is actually a fruit.  This may stun some of you.
>	I know that I wouldn't put on my cereal either.

Obviously it is a fruit, but that in no way precludes it also
being a vegetable.  The 2 sets are not mutually exclusive.