Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!caip!sri-spam!nike!think!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!wanginst!apollo!nazgul From: nazgul@apollo.uucp (Kee Hinckley) Newsgroups: net.news.group,soc.singles Subject: Re: Saving net.singles--what for? Message-ID: <303f1187.46@apollo.uucp> Date: Sun, 21-Sep-86 17:36:53 EDT Article-I.D.: apollo.303f1187.46 Posted: Sun Sep 21 17:36:53 1986 Date-Received: Mon, 22-Sep-86 07:46:46 EDT References: <213@hao.UUCP> <214@hao.UUCP> <15672@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <215@hao.UUCP> Reply-To: nazgul@apollo.UUCP (Kee Hinckley) Organization: Apollo Computer, Chelmsford, MA Lines: 27 Xref: mnetor net.news.group:3470 soc.singles:22 In article <215@hao.UUCP> woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods) writes: > I personally think net.singles needs to > be moderated, but that seems to be a minority opinion. Finding a moderator > that would be acceptable would be tough. I can't think of anyone who reads > and posts here regularly who hasn't had at least one controversial viewpoint > (myself included). A moderator would certainly be nice, but I can't think of any way of doing it that would not result in a full-time job. The current flow seems to be about 300 or so articles a week. The other problem with moderation is it makes it harder to respond to individual items or people, something that is much more important in net.singles where the number of people and the number of topics is greater than in most moderated newsgroups. I think net.singles moderation will have to wait for either a *real* good AI program or a payed moderator. (How about it folks, I'll do it for a buck an article, any other bids?! :-) -kee -- ...{mit-eddie,yale,uw-beaver,decvax!wanginst}!apollo!nazgul Apollo Computer, Chelmsford MA. (617) 256-6600 x7587 or 499B Boston Rd, Groton MA. (617) 448-2863 I'm not sure which upsets me more; that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's.