Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!husc6!topaz!martin
From: martin@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Still Crazy After All These Years)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: A few suggestions/subjects/ I may be big, but....
Message-ID: <5856@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Fri, 19-Sep-86 12:13:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.5856
Posted: Fri Sep 19 12:13:17 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 23-Sep-86 00:45:29 EDT
References: <1058@k.cs.cmu.edu> <3269@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: martin@topaz.UUCP (Pooh, hijacking Portable Liz's account)
Followup-To: caip!unirot!pooh
Organization: Refuge for Newsless Bears, New Brunswick, NJ
Lines: 35
Keywords: NIKKI?!?!?

In article <3269@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU> barry@mit-eddie.UUCP (Mikki Barry) writes:
>You know, we have been known to split a gut or two without even posting.
>Join our wonderful class for details.

Not to mention our pants, some of us. . . oops!

>Ah, but which of us is gullible, and which is the chewing gum?  Or is it
>the baseball field?

You're a more likely candidate for gull, Sensei.  Jonathan Livingston
Mikki, and all that. . .

>> Of course we need more info on what is
>>considered "big" by the intended victims.  I assume 6' 4" and 220 lbs is big
>>enough, but how much smaller can we go and still pass?

Uh, sometimes "big" doesn't necessarily refer to height. . . Dorothy?
Remember when we were drinking Grizzly Beer and looking for the Great
Kielbasa?

>Pass for big, or pass for stupid?  Or perhaps pass through a hoop?
>In any case, we'll never give our our criteria in advance.  What kind
>of girls do you think we are anyway?

Confused ones, that's fer damn sure.  They've gotta be big, and stupid,
and nice--oops, I mean a jerk--and they've got to look like Erik Fair
and wield a bullwhip like Harrison Ford and. . .

Pooh      topaz!unipress!pooh
          caip!unirot!pooh  <-- when it comes back up
          pooh@aim.rutgers.edu

"This could very well be the most stupid person on the face
  of the earth."
"Should we shoot him?"