Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!think!husc6!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!sun!oliveb!tymix!whitehur From: whitehur@tymix.UUCP Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women Subject: Re: Yale-Harvard marriage study Message-ID: <837@tymix.UUCP> Date: Fri, 3-Oct-86 20:10:26 EDT Article-I.D.: tymix.837 Posted: Fri Oct 3 20:10:26 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 8-Oct-86 06:08:45 EDT References: <14915@onfcanim.UUCP> <519@randvax.UUCP> Reply-To: whitehur@tymix.UUCP (Pamela K. Whitehurst) Distribution: net Organization: Tymnet Inc., Cupertino CA Lines: 32 Keywords: bitch, bitch, bitch Xref: watmath soc.singles:329 soc.women:224 In article <435@cci632.UUCP> rb@ccird1.UUCP (Rex Ballard) writes: >The partner with the greater education, training, experience, and success >has a right to expect the partner with less to make sacrifices. If that >means the woman has more success, then the man should "give way". Why? Is it really better for their marriage, or even their future for the less experienced person to always be expected to sacrifice? If the marriage rules were 'only one person can be successful' then perhaps we could expect the above situation. We would also see successful people attracted to unsuccessful people in order to cut down competition at home. (It's you or me babe, and I intend to see that it's me [:-(]) The partner with greater education, training, experience, and success has a right to look at the situation, its effect on the future of the relationship, the possible alternatives, and decide what course of action will produce the best results in the short and long term. (Of course, discussing this with the other person will help a lot.) I do not believe that marriage should have too many win/lose situations. -- Disclaimer: This is just my responding, with an ambiguous language, to what someone else wrote, in an ambiguous language. At no time did I read anyone's mind to find out what they really meant. Pamela K. Whitehurst ...!hplabs!oliveb!tymix!whitehur ...!sun!idi!tymix!whitehur "Yes, it is bread we fight for, but we fight for roses too."