Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!pyrnj!mirror!gabriel!inmet!mazur
From: mazur@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: The latest in Playboy controver
Message-ID: <119100004@inmet>
Date: Thu, 9-Oct-86 11:58:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: inmet.119100004
Posted: Thu Oct  9 11:58:00 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 12-Oct-86 01:48:40 EDT
References: <732@midas.UUCP>
Lines: 17
Nf-ID: #R:midas.UUCP:-73200:inmet:119100004:000:772
Nf-From: inmet.UUCP!mazur    Oct  9 11:58:00 1986


>>	I know when I see a man sporting one of those Playboy logos..or
>>  whatever...the picture of the bunny head...I get angry.  I find it hard
>>  to tolerate a man who is proud of viewing women as sex toys.

> Do you have any *evidence* that a guy with a Playboy logo is "proud of
> viewing women as sex toys"? I can easily imagine some man viewing women
> as sex toys, but being proud of it seems a truly bizarre notion.

Absolutely not pertinent to the discussion, but I find it hilarious that
my 86 year-old grandmother has a pair of eye-glass frames that have the
Playboy logo on them.  Of course, since she is almost legally blind, she
can't see it - and no one in our family would ever tell her - she'd have
a coronary!  

Beth Mazur
{ihnp4,mirror,ima}!inmet!mazur