Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!topaz!lll-crg!bandy
From: bandy@lll-crg.ARpA (Andrew Scott Beals)
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: College educated women have access to a higher quality of men?
Message-ID: <6816@lll-crg.ARpA>
Date: Fri, 10-Oct-86 17:43:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: lll-crg.6816
Posted: Fri Oct 10 17:43:10 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 12-Oct-86 04:20:41 EDT
References: <119100001@inmet> <488@cci632.UUCP>
Reply-To: bandy@lll-crg.UUCP (Andrew Scott Beals)
Organization: Computation Research Group, Lawrence Livermore Labs
Lines: 26
Summary: Uh huh.  Right.

In article <488@cci632.UUCP> rb@ccird2.UUCP (Rex Ballard) writes:
>It also looks like someone is comparing apples and oranges.  College educated
>women have access to a higher quality of men, have interests that get them
>involved with other men, and in general "circulate" more.

Why do you say this?  Do people who go to college avoid drinking beer
and watching football tv?  [no flames, please, taking a canonical example..
Mr Futor is likely to flame me in person...]

>Many less educated women go into fields where they are working with other
>women.

Now, look in that secretarial pool....  How much mixing goes on there?

>It would be interesting to see what the figures are for women in general.
>I would guess that women in general still have a better chance than
>the Harvard-Yale study shows, but lower than the Moore study shows.

Who cares except the yuppie statisticians?  Your someone's local situation
has little, if anything to do with sadistics.
-- 
Andrew Scott Beals	(member of HASA - A and S divisions)
bandy@lll-crg.arpa	{ihnp4,seismo,ll-xn,ptsfa,pyramid}!lll-crg!bandy
LLNL, P.O. Box 808, Mailstop L-419, Livermore CA 94550 (415) 423-1948

Question Authority - Think For Yourself.