Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!husc6!topaz!ll-xn!mit-amt!mit-eddie!barry From: barry@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU (Mikki Barry) Newsgroups: soc.singles Subject: Re: A few suggestions/subjects/ I may be big, but.... Message-ID: <3269@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU> Date: Thu, 18-Sep-86 21:26:43 EDT Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.3269 Posted: Thu Sep 18 21:26:43 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 23-Sep-86 02:06:58 EDT References: <1058@k.cs.cmu.edu> Reply-To: barry@mit-eddie.UUCP (Mikki Barry) Organization: MIT, EE/CS Computer Facilities, Cambridge, MA Lines: 41 Keywords: NIKKI?!?!? In article <1058@k.cs.cmu.edu> jwa@k.cs.cmu.edu.UUCP writes: >Hi, Why hello to you too! >Lifestyles of the Big and Stupid. Oooh baby! > To all the Kick-me-do's out there I have to say you sound like a real fun >bunch. I just about split a gut laughing at a few of your posts. You know, we have been known to split a gut or two without even posting. Join our wonderful class for details. But you know, since you can actually READ our postings, you have disqualified yourself as a candidate for our dump 'em on the side of the road technique. The black belt test of Kik-Mi-Do. Unless, of course you eat velcro for breakfast. >and anyone else who is game and fits the spec's, I'd like to suggest posing as >big and stupid and turn the tables on Pooh and Nikki. Now wait just a minute here. I may have been mistaken. He can't spell my name! Perhaps we *will* accept him after all! > Then we can post about Lifestyles of the Gullible and Wriggly. Ah, but which of us is gullible, and which is the chewing gum? Or is it the baseball field? > Of course we need more info on what is >considered "big" by the intended victims. I assume 6' 4" and 220 lbs is big >enough, but how much smaller can we go and still pass? Pass for big, or pass for stupid? Or perhaps pass through a hoop? In any case, we'll never give our our criteria in advance. What kind of girls do you think we are anyway? Mikki (WITH AN "M") Barry "in search of the Big and Stupid"