Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!think!mit-eddie!mit-trillian!henry
From: henry@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU (Henry Mensch)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women
Subject: Re: What's wrong with Playboy?
Message-ID: <1260@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 13-Oct-86 12:50:26 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-tril.1260
Posted: Mon Oct 13 12:50:26 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 14-Oct-86 06:24:40 EDT
References: <4107@reed.UUCP> <1076@sunybcs.UUCP> <1502@burl.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: henry@athena.mit.edu (Henry Mensch)
Organization: The Temple of St. Todd the Incontinent
Lines: 30
Xref: watmath soc.singles:501 soc.women:322

In article <1502@burl.ATT.COM> rcj@burl.UUCP (Curtis Jackson) writes:
>Now the point of all this is that she doesn't give a damn where I stoke up
>my friend Lee Bideaux (libido, for non-Cajuns), as long as I bring him to
>bed, too.  And neither she nor I mind the other treating us as a sex toy
>on occasion.

Ohmygawd!  Menage-a-trois!  What *is* this world coming to?  

>Anyway, I guess this was a long-winded way to say that I don't know of
>anyone who wouldn't want to be *the right person's* sex toy.  .  .  

Isn't that the point of soc.singles? ;-)

>Oh, for you women who don't consider looking at the male body a sin (I think
>you ought to enjoy it if you lean that way), I heard they now have "Rabbits"
>(male waitpersons) to match the female Bunnies at what used to be the Playboy
>club in AC. 

Well, to be quite honest I haven't seen any "rabbits" at Playboy
Clubs, and I imagine they wouldn't be very exciting (I've always
considered the garp of the "bunnies" to be lacking something ... no
pun intended).  Besides, how would they dress a "rabbit?"  Does the
rabbit prance around the restaurant in a speedo swimsuit?

An Inquiring Mind,
		   Major Faux Pas ("Where, where?")
-- 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Henry Mensch     |   XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX  | XXX/XXXXXXX XXXXXX
henry@athena.mit.edu          ..!mit-eddie!mit-athena!henry