Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!husc6!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!hplabs!sdcrdcf!ism780c!ism780!jimb
From: jimb@ism780
Newsgroups: soc.singles
Subject: Re: experience in a sexual partner
Message-ID: <90000020@ism780>
Date: Sun, 21-Sep-86 01:56:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ism780.90000020
Posted: Sun Sep 21 01:56:00 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 23-Sep-86 04:09:51 EDT
References: <15686@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Lines: 23
Nf-ID: #R:ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU:15686:ism780:90000020:000:976
Nf-From: ism780!jimb    Sep 20 22:56:00 1986



Ken Kaufman writes:
> Besides, other factors are perhaps more essential to having a good roll
> in the hay than partner's experience.  Try partner's natural talent and
> the compatibility between the two of you.

Bingo!

In my experience, compatibility is the best determinant of the quality of a
sexual relationship.  This is a slippery term, though, because I see two
kinds of compatibility involved -- sexual and general.  Both together are
great.  The former can be developed if the latter is there, which is why
inexperienced partners never bothered me.  (Actually, I found them an awful
lot of fun, once I had dropped enough hang-ups about sex that *I* was
comfortable with it.  I *wish* someone had nicely pursued me when *I* was a
virgin, but that's another story.)  Unfortunately, if the former is there but
not the latter, this is a good indicator of an incandescent X-night/week
stand.

				-- from the muddled mind of Jim Brunet

				UCBVAX/HPLABS/HAO/ICO/ISM780