Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!think!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!bellcore!ulysses!cbosgd!mark From: mark@cbosgd.UUCP (Mark Horton) Newsgroups: net.news.group,soc.singles Subject: Re: mistakes in reorganisation Message-ID: <2615@cbosgd.UUCP> Date: Sat, 20-Sep-86 23:58:28 EDT Article-I.D.: cbosgd.2615 Posted: Sat Sep 20 23:58:28 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 23-Sep-86 07:45:51 EDT References: <12615@kestrel.ARPA> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus, Oh Lines: 35 Xref: mnetor net.news.group:3480 soc.singles:72 It is indeed possible to move a newsgroup later, so none of this is truly carved in stone. But we do need to keep it moving, and the move is under way. I would like to explain the current situation, since there seems to be a lot of misunderstanding. net.singles. Many people feel that in a totally fair world, this should be soc.singles. However, if you look at the arbitron stats, you'll see that net.singles is the 7th most popular group on the net. So while the content and volume may seem characteristic of a talk group, it's so popular that it wouldn't be right to put it into talk. net.jokes. The same thing applies as net.singles, although net.jokes is currently listed #2. It's too popular to put into talk. mod.philosophy.tech. This issue is really moot, because there's no traffic in that group. Without traffic, it's impossible to judge what volume, content, and readership would be. Furthermore, the current situation is that mod.* will stay where they are for the time being. Whether mod.* gets moved, and what the new names will be, are still very much undecided. It seems to me that if the eventual traffic proves to be of technical use to some significant part of the net in performing their jobs, it might belong in sci. On the other hand, philosophical discussions, even if technical, may belong in talk if their only purpose is a fun diversion for the participants. net.wobegon. The only issue here is whether the net is better served by a newsgroup (posted everywhere, and consuming a slot in the active file), by a mailing list, or by sharing another newsgroup. net.wobegon is low on the readership list, although certainly not at or even near the bottom. (#158 of 216.) Mark