Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ritcv!cci632!rb
From: rb@cci632.UUCP (Rex Ballard)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women
Subject: Double standards! Re: The latest in Playboy controversies
Message-ID: <426@cci632.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 29-Sep-86 18:37:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: cci632.426
Posted: Mon Sep 29 18:37:27 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 30-Sep-86 21:45:03 EDT
References: <4107@reed.UUCP> <1056@dadla.UUCP> <246@zen.BERKELEY.EDU> <709@midas.UUCP>
Reply-To: rb@ccird1.UUCP (Rex Ballard)
Organization: CCI, Rochester Development, Rochester, NY
Lines: 17
Xref: linus soc.singles:291 soc.women:146

In article <709@midas.UUCP> jeffw@midas.UUCP (Jeff Winslow) writes:
>In article <246@zen.BERKELEY.EDU> korn@cory.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP (Peter "Arrgh" Korn) writes:
>
>>A close female friend of mine got revenge:  she got a subscription
>>to playgirl, and, after a year's worth of nude male pics had been
>>accumulated, she posted them up ALL over campus.  Needless to say,
>>they were all torn down within 30 minutes (mostly by male staff
>>members).
>That's a damn shame.
>					Jeff Winslow
Ever notice that female full frontal nudity is rated "R" in films
while male full frontal nudity is rated "X"?

Compare "Bachelor Party", or even "Stepford Wives".

In "Cool Hand Luke", and "Deliverance", scenes depicting male
genitals had to be restaged to get past the ratings boards.