Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watvlsi.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!watvlsi!joe From: joe@watvlsi.UUCP (Joe Morrison) Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women Subject: Re: Feminists Message-ID: <3145@watvlsi.UUCP> Date: Wed, 1-Oct-86 13:17:27 EDT Article-I.D.: watvlsi.3145 Posted: Wed Oct 1 13:17:27 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 2-Oct-86 21:46:15 EDT References: <4107@reed.UUCP> <7428@sun.uucp> <153@endot.UUCP> <1116@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU> Reply-To: joe@watvlsi.UUCP (Joe Morrison) Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 74 Xref: watmath soc.singles:257 soc.women:165 Summary: kathy: >>I hope people these days realize that it's entirely possible to >>be a feminist without protesting everything. cheryl: >And what is it that you intend to accept rather than protest? >Do you propose to accept everything, rather than be accused >of protesting everything? joe: Not protesting everything doesn't necessarily mean accepting everything. A number of my friends are feminists and I share their views. I don't "protest everything" but I try and do things that remind my male friends of my views. I'm not dogmatic about the issue and so my friends tend to respect my views. In that small way I am doing my part for the feminist movement, without officially "protesting". kathy: >>I mean in the 70's everyone was more radical and it gave >>non-feminists a bad taste in their mouths (so to speak). cheryl: >AWWWW, I feel SO sorry for them. We put a bad taste in their mouths, >when what they deserved was to be run out of town, sued to the >gills, thrown in jail, had their self-serving laws declared ... etc... >I'm SO afraid of putting a bad taste in their mouths, oh, yes. joe: Is this supposed to be a rebuttal? Kathy might have worded her sentence a bit better, but I agree with it! My male friends tend to chuckle when they hear the word "feminist" and make the usual jokes, because many feminists *are* man-haters and go out of their way to alienate men. To help the feminist cause, men's perceptions have to change. Running the men out of town, etc. is not going to accomplish this! kathy: >>Some feminists just haven't learned that screaming your views at >>some people don't make them listen--if anything they block their >>ears completely. cheryl: >And you think that whispering your views will make them listen? >I've got news for you. If you whisper, your voice will be ignored, >just like I almost ignored your timid little mealy-mouthed posting. joe: Kathy is right! And stop making the world black and white! People don't have to choose between screaming or whispering, there are lots of alternative, MORE USEFUL positions to take. Also, there is no reason to call a posting "mealy-mouthed" - we're all paying for this net and no one has the right to intimidate netters who have something to say. Cheryl, I hope you don't interpret this posting as a flame. I've been enjoying this newgroup for a while, and I really hate it when I sense anger or hatred. That's mostly why I wrote this. I'm looking forward to comments about my posting but I hope this doesn't turn into a name-calling newsgroup. On a new topic, (and if anyone follows this up, I think you should delete soc.singles from the newsgroups line) one of my interests is in genderless writing. This is extremely difficult to do in English. There is an excellent article about genderless writing by Douglas Hofstatder in his book "Metamagical Themas", pp.136-167. Has anyone read this? Anyone have any ideas or tips about genderless writing? -- Joe Morrison VLSI Group University of Waterloo {decvax,allegra,ihnp4}!watmath!watvlsi!joe -- "The first fifteen million years -- they were the worst..."