Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!elbereth!rutgers!seismo!rochester!ritcv!cci632!rb
From: rb@cci632.UUCP (Rex Ballard)
Newsgroups: soc.singles,soc.women
Subject: Re: Double standards!
Message-ID: <463@cci632.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 6-Oct-86 10:37:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: cci632.463
Posted: Mon Oct  6 10:37:07 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 8-Oct-86 23:40:24 EDT
References: <426@cci632.UUCP> <1077@sunybcs.UUCP>
Reply-To: rb@ccird2.UUCP (Rex Ballard)
Organization: CCI, Rochester Development, Rochester, NY
Lines: 32
Xref: watmath soc.singles:360 soc.women:247
Summary: Appearance.

In article <1077@sunybcs.UUCP> ugeileen@gort.UUCP (Eileen McGowan) writes:
>In article <426@cci632.UUCP> rb@ccird1.UUCP (Rex Ballard) writes:
>>Ever notice that female full frontal nudity is rated "R" in films
>>while male full frontal nudity is rated "X"?
>>
>>Compare "Bachelor Party", or even "Stepford Wives".
>>
>>In "Cool Hand Luke", and "Deliverance", scenes depicting male
>>genitals had to be restaged to get past the ratings boards.
>
>  I like these men to walk around, for one day, each wearing a pair
>  of tight leotards....:-) 

What would you do if they did?

Another problem of double standards.  Many men consider physical
appearance to be so much less important than other factors (money,
power, influence), that if they DID wear tight leotards, it probably
would not be an arousing sight.

These same men who would look like elephants in tight leotards
however, expect their women to be perfectly proportioned :-(

The men who do look good in leotards, are neither respected enough
by men, nor attractive enough to women, to merit the effort.

A man, no matter how physically/sexually attractive, will usually
have to initiate the relationship, and pay the bills as well.

I USED to look good in a leotard :-).
(I just started my diet today, thanks for the reinforcement :-).
Rex B.