Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!lll-crg!seismo!rochester!cornell!batcomputer!garry
From: garry@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU (Garry Wiegand)
Newsgroups: net.med,soc.women
Subject: Re: Selecting the sex...
Message-ID: <1178@batcomputer.TN.CORNELL.EDU>
Date: Mon, 6-Oct-86 22:12:58 EDT
Article-I.D.: batcompu.1178
Posted: Mon Oct  6 22:12:58 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 9-Oct-86 01:26:22 EDT
Reply-To: garry%cadif-oak@cu-arpa.cs.cornell.edu
Organization: Cornell Engineering && Flying Moose Graphics
Lines: 32
Xref: watmath net.med:5096 soc.women:259

(3rd attempt at posting, I *think* the other 2 vanished :-)

In a recent article in mod.comp-soc hplabs!taylor (Dave Taylor) wrote:
> From a fairly reputable source last night, I heard that a product has
> just been introduced on the market that allows parents to choose the
> sex of their unborn child.
>
> There is also a big uproar about it...

We were just talking about this yesterday: my own thought was that at
first, in many societies, boy babies would be preferred. There would
be more cannon fodder to fight wars with, and more male competition and
violence in general. And that would be a Bad Thing.

But as female babies and females became less numerous in the population, 
the societies and families might discover that the numerous males were 
always throwing themselves into wars and getting killed (I'm thinking of 
Iran and Iraq), less able to procreate (by the numbers), and in general 
being not-too-useful for one's declining years and for society. Then 
female children would become, willy-nilly, more valuable and more valued. 
Things might or might not recover to equality of numbers, but at least there 
would be equality of *value*. It would be a dramatic change of thinking. 
And that would be a Good Thing.  

(The U.S., on the average, might go against the grain - purely subjective, but 
the women I know seem to hope for girl children, and the men I know do too.)

garry wiegand   (garry%cadif-oak@cu-arpa.cs.cornell.edu)

PS - I'm not much interested in receiving pseudo-Christian flames about
     "interfering with God's Will". (Honest ethical/moral discussions, are, 
     on the other hand, always most welcome.)