Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!yale!husc6!uwvax!caip!sri-spam!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!hplabs!sdcrdcf!randvax!edhall
From: edhall@randvax.UUCP (Ed Hall)
Newsgroups: soc.women
Subject: Re: Reverse sexism is OK. (Actually reverse discrimination)
Message-ID: <528@randvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Sep-86 04:07:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: randvax.528
Posted: Thu Sep 18 04:07:48 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 23-Sep-86 03:30:41 EDT
References: <4828@decwrl.DEC.COM> <1944@mtgzy.UUCP>
Reply-To: edhall@rand-unix.UUCP (Ed Hall)
Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica
Lines: 23

In article <1040@dadla.UUCP> rob@dadla.UUCP (Rob Vetter) writes:
>In article <923@ihu1h.UUCP> jailbird@ihu1h.UUCP (Harvey) writes:
>>
>>President Johnson defended affirmative action this way:
>>
>>	Imagine a hundred yard dash in which one of the two
>>	runners has his legs shackled together. He has pro-
>>	gressed ten yards while the unshackled runner has 
>>	gone 50 yards. At that point the judges decide the 
>>	race is unfair. How do they rectify the situation? Do
>
>
>The best soulution is to restart both runners, but shackle the second
>this time - reverse discrimination :-)
>
>-- 
>
>Rob Vetter

Nice try, Rob--but there are no restarts in this race.

		-Ed Hall
		decvax!randvax!edhall