Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!caip!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!pyramid!decwrl!larrabee
From: larrabee@decwrl.DEC.COM (Tracy Larrabee)
Newsgroups: soc.women
Subject: Re: Do We Really NEED This Group?
Message-ID: <5539@decwrl.DEC.COM>
Date: Thu, 25-Sep-86 16:44:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.5539
Posted: Thu Sep 25 16:44:48 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 29-Sep-86 00:35:52 EDT
References: <982@hou2g.UUCP>
Reply-To: larrabee@decwrl.UUCP (Tracy Larrabee)
Organization: DEC Western Research Lab, Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 19

In article <982@hou2g.UUCP> scott@hou2g.UUCP (Ma-Ma-Ma-Max Ma-Ma-Max Headroom) writes:
>
>
>Well, after attempting to get through all the articles in this group,
>I've noticed something interesting.  Roughly 2 % of the articles here
>on net.women were NOT cross-posted to/from somewhere else.  Why don't we
>just eliminated the group?  Unless you want to read about business
>letter salutations, everything on here can be read in net.singles,
>net.religion.jewish, or the occasional foray into net.jokes. :-)

I suggest you not read this group.  As for me, my newsreading software
will only show me a cross-posted article in the first group I read to
which it is posted.  Not to mention that I have completely given up on
net.singles and net.jokes.

Why do people waste bandwidth trying to get rid of groups they clearly
have no sympathy for?
--
Tracy Larrabee	tracy@sushi.stanford.edu	decwrl!larrabee