Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!husc6!uwvax!rutgers!nike!oliveb!trash
From: trash@oliveb.UUCP (Tom Repa)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: Re: Best for Other Spare Body Parts?
Message-ID: <108@oliveb.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 11-Oct-86 18:38:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: oliveb.108
Posted: Sat Oct 11 18:38:06 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 16-Oct-86 06:55:55 EDT
References: <12063@watnot.UUCP>
Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino, Ca
Lines: 23

From  Paul D. Obeda
> ... Hmm.  It seems to me that a not so very long ago some med students
> were charged with murder.  There weren't enough cadavers to go around,
> so, well... 
> As far as using fetal remains in experiments, Mike, I, and many others
> find such highly repulsive.  Since, in this case, you freely admit
> that there are many alternative sources for the required tissue, why
> is there any hesitation in condemning the use of fetal tissue??  Why
> be unnecessarily contrary, except to be closed-minded?
	No, not to be close-minded, but to let the research continue.
If the experts in the field think this would be a fruitful course to
follow, let them. I have already given my reasons for disbelieving the 
spare parts scenario, so I have no problems with letting the research 
continue. I worry when non-experts try to tell experts how to conduct 
their experiments.
	Trying to regulate your nieghbors so they must abide by your 
religionous convictions, now that's repulsive.
			 	Tom Repa (trash@oliven)
-- 
  WATCH OUT! You might get what you're after.   -  T. Heads


Path:	{allegra,glacier,hplabs,ihnp4}!oliveb!oliven!trash