Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!ucbcad!nike!sri-spam!rutgers!andromeda!marco
From: marco@andromeda.UUCP (the wharf rat)
Newsgroups: talk.abortion
Subject: Re: I wonder why??
Message-ID: <30@andromeda.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 3-Oct-86 14:46:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: andromed.30
Posted: Fri Oct  3 14:46:06 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Oct-86 07:16:51 EDT
References: <888@ssc-vax.UUCP> <1213@bunker.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: Franklin's Tower
Lines: 30
Summary: Scattered like lost words.....

In article <1213@bunker.UUCP>, garys@bunker.UUCP (Gary M. Samuelson) writes:
> 
> Rather, shouldn't both positions be evaluated on their merits, rather
> than on who happens to hold them?
> 
	NO.  I've always thought that men should not have any say in
abortion laws.  It's always easy to make laws for someone else to live
with; just like the way rich people make all the tax laws- who gets the shaft ?

> 
> I get it -- the pro-choice position is that there is no choice.
> 
	No choice but pro-choice !! :-)

> 
> Sure, kill 'em before anyone sees 'em.  
> 
	No, kill 'em before they're alive.  Wait, how can you kill something
that's not alive in the first place ?  Guess I mean "terminate" or wait, I've
got it, ABORT them before they turn into babies !

> What has the age of an idea to do
> with its validity?
> 
	Sometimes nothing, sometimes lots.  Still believe the world's flat ?

                                                    W.rat

$ kill -9 baby
kill: no such process