Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!yale!decvax!tektronix!teklds!cae780!amdcad!amd!intelca!qantel!lll-lcc!lll-crg!rutgers!caip!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!houxm!houem!marty1 From: marty1@houem.UUCP Newsgroups: talk.abortion Subject: Re: It's still mine Message-ID: <636@houem.UUCP> Date: Wed, 1-Oct-86 19:13:09 EDT Article-I.D.: houem.636 Posted: Wed Oct 1 19:13:09 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 11-Oct-86 09:05:51 EDT References: <5152@decwrl.DEC.COM> <1091@ogcvax.UUCP> <631@houem.UUCP>, <1597@cbdkc1.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 19 In <1597@cbdkc1.UUCP>, pmd@cbdkc1.UUCP (Paul M. Dubuc) purports to answer my response to an article of his. He has so misrepresented my position that I cannot answer his article. He says > ... Why do you apparently give her the blank check of "pursuit >of happiness", subordinating the life of the fetus to whatever reason >she fills in? Of course, I did no such thing. I stated certain logical relationships: >> ... The state, in the exercise of its police powers, CAN >>protect a two-year-old WITHOUT imposing on the pursuit of happiness >>of any other person. (caps added). And so on. M. B. Brilliant Marty AT&T-BL HO 3D-520 (201)-949-1858 Holmdel, NJ 07733 ihnp4!houem!marty1