Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!nike!oliveb!glacier!kestrel!ladkin
From: ladkin@kestrel.ARPA (Peter Ladkin)
Newsgroups: talk.philosophy.misc
Subject: Re: A and not A
Message-ID: <12881@kestrel.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 26-Sep-86 17:57:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: kestrel.12881
Posted: Fri Sep 26 17:57:19 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 29-Sep-86 01:52:17 EDT
References: <3539@umcp-cs.UUCP> <12726@kestrel.ARPA> <3591@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Organization: Kestrel Institute, Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 17

In article <3591@umcp-cs.UUCP>, mark@umcp-cs.UUCP (Mark Weiser) writes:
> Oh, I bet you are one of those who .....

......was completely puzzled by what you meant.


> That is why 'truth' as 'part of the possible existence of people',
> while just a shorthand expression, is a lot closer to what truth
> really means than the logicians definition.

How about giving the longhand definition instead? I still find
the shorthand incomprehensible.

About Heidegger, have you read any of Dreyfus's commentaries?

Peter Ladkin
ladkin@kestrel.arpa