Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!qantel!lll-lcc!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!hplabs!sdcrdcf!psivax!nrcvax!terry From: terry@nrcvax.UUCP (Terry Grevstad) Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,net.med Subject: Re: Drug Abuse - True Problem or Media Hype? Message-ID: <720@nrcvax.UUCP> Date: Wed, 24-Sep-86 17:41:11 EDT Article-I.D.: nrcvax.720 Posted: Wed Sep 24 17:41:11 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 30-Sep-86 14:20:11 EDT References: <720@scc.UUCP> <20756@rochester.ARPA> <463@epimass.UUCP> <1302@trwrb.UUCP> <374@necntc.UUCP> Reply-To: terry@nrcvax.UUCP (Terry Grevstad) Organization: Network Research Corp. Oxnard,CA Lines: 30 Xref: watmath talk.politics.misc:411 net.med:4962 gkb@necntc.UUCP (Greg Busby) says: >> But for starters, I don't think that tobacco users have >> to steal to support their "habit". Similar for alcohol >> users. >And neither would drug users if the drugs weren't sold on the black >market, which always has high prices for its commodities (how expensive >was alcohol during prohibition?). If drugs were >legal, the competition in the market would drive prices down to the >point where stealing wouldn't be necessary. One small question here: Some drugs taken often seem to make it virtually impossible for a person to hold a job. It seems to me, therefore, that even if drugs were cheap, there would still be some stealing for drug money, because the addicted persons wouldn't be able to work. (In case you didn't notice, I'm not talking about the casual user or the social user, but the hard-core, can't-live-without-it addict.) -- _______________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- without a Terry Grevstad ECNALG Network Research Corporation ihnp4!nrcvax!terry {sdcsvax,hplabs}!sdcrdcf!psivax!nrcvax!terry _______________________________________________________________________ -----------------------------------------------------------------------